Abuse Of The Wild Animals
Generally, we assume wild animals have it much better off in captivity. After all, they can live free of predation fears and free of worrying about where their next meal will come from. Yet, a four-year study published by Oxford University in 2003 found that the median lifespan for an African zoo elephant was 16.9 years, but nature preserve elephants lived to be 56. They added that “the keeping of naturally wide-ranging carnivores should be fundamentally improved or phased out,” since bears, cheetahs, lions and tigers need far more space than they are given to roam.
Organizations like Animal Liberation Victoria rigorously debate zoos as positive forces of change. They argue that only 120 out of 5,926 endangered species are in breeding programs in zoos, not to mention animals like elephants and pandas are difficult to breed in captivity. Small populations may resort to inbreeding, which produces weaker offspring. The lack of survival instincts, poaching and habitat destruction threatens the survival of re-introduced wild animals anyway. Therefore, the argument that these animal exhibits promote conservation of exotic animals is a myth, ALV of Australia argues.
Another claim by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums is that their programs provide an opportunity for people to see, learn and contribute to the preservation of wild animals. However, ALV members believe that keeping animals locked up is no way to create an animal exhibit! This unfair captivity even distorts the animals’ behavior and doesn’t really give humans a realistic glimpse of these animals’ true natures. Arguably, a nature documentary or a book would give people the most accurate portrayal of a wild animal’s life.
A 2003 Oxford University study found that wild animals like cheetahs, lions, tigers and polar bears “show the most evidence of stress and/or psychological dysfunction in captivity.” When comparing the space differences, researchers found that 22% of all zoological society species, including the Asian elephant, chimpanzee, giraffe and California sea lion, were kept in spaces 1,000 times’ smaller than their minimum home range. The African buffalo’s living quarters were actually 10,000 smaller than the minimum home range for the animal, on average. Only 10% of the species had enclosures even comparable to their natural environment’s size. The author reported that it’s comparable to a human living a life in a telephone box. The report concluded: “These animals are designed for a life in the wild, not for a life in a zoo for the amusement of humans. It is now down to the public to express their concern by avoiding zoos.”
Jeremy Larson is a foremost expert in the acid reflux home remedies. He has had extensive experience and conducted countless experiments in finding its cure. He is also a highly acclaimed writer in the medical field and you can find out more at remedyforacidreflux.com.
Related posts:
- Abuse Of The Wild Animals
- Zoos And Cruelty of Wild Animals
- What More To Know About Zoos
- World’s Best Parks And Zoos
- Baby Animals Nursery Bedding Sets: Let In The Comely Menagerie Varmints Into Your Nipper’s Alcove